In an effort to reduce possible theft, the recent removal of bags from the on-campus convenience shop (often known as the “C-Store”) has sparked disagreement among students, particularly those living in Westerlin Hall. Some say that the change will help prevent shoplifting, but this remedy fails to address the basis of the problem and adds an annoyance with no obvious benefits.
As a frequent visitor to the C-Store, I chatted with students and staff to learn how this change has affected both sides. Many people believe that eliminating bags is a more effective barrier to convenience than thievery. Those living outside of Westerlin, who rely on the shop for rapid access to necessities, are most affected. With no bags provided, students must awkwardly lug stuff across campus and back to their dorms or bring their own bags in preparation, a burden that appears disproportionate to any genuine security benefit.
What bothers students is the lack of information about the change. Policies aimed at boosting security or security threats have historically gone unannounced at our institution, often being announced only after it has taken place or not at all. We must overcome communication gaps, which have resulted in an unpleasant pattern of surprise limitations.
Students have had to deal with unexpected on spot rules concerning several things that haven’t been discussed widely enough.
Informed, proactive communication through email or the existing Augie Alerts system with students might overcome this divide by encouraging cooperation prior to these limits being imposed rather than unilateral policymaking. This simple remedy might ease many students’ frustration—not only with bag loss, but also with the perception that security regulations are developed without student involvement or consideration.
If theft is a serious threat, proper solutions should be prioritized before temporary solutions. In some schools, minor but sensible changes such as installing more unobtrusive cameras or conducting regular check-ins by campus officers have been useful.
These approaches are non-intrusive, addressing the issue without jeopardizing students’ daily comfort. Increasing visibility in the shop and on campus might result in a safer atmosphere without sacrificing convenience.
Finally, resolving security issues necessitates sophisticated, well-communicated tactics, rather than haphazard procedures that leave students hauling an embarrassing amount of food across Augustana’s campus.
