We do not know who dumped hundreds of Feb. 20 Observers in the trash; we do not know why you did what you did. But the editorial staff of the Observer writes this so you understand what our purpose is as a news organization. We write this editorial so you understand how you insulted the Augustana community.
In many ways, producing news is an arduous undertaking. The Observer’s staff of 30 writers, photographers, designers, videographers and editors spends every week of the school year pitching assignments, corresponding with and interviewing sources, planning, drafting, revising, fact-checking, acknowledging our bias and re-writing. Every week, we spend hours drawing, designing, recording and taking photos.
We don’t do it for the minimum-wage pay or the single line on our résumés but because the Observer has a responsibility to seek truth. We push forward with exhausting questions and relentless deadlines because we recognize our duty to do justice to Augie’s stories. We do it in order to bring you as complete a picture as we can about the place you go to school, find yourself and grow – the place you live.
And we take this relationship seriously.
So when you throw Observers in the trash, you aren’t just burying news. You are erasing people’s stories and a collective history of a place to which you belong. It is a collection of experiences that we all are a part of – that you help shape.
Regardless of how unpopular our articles are or how difficult the subject matter is, the Observer will not stop doing its duty. We will look for truth even when it is ugly and complicated and doesn’t paint a positive picture. We will continuously seek your voice even when you are afraid, because it matters that you are heard. We will encourage you again and again to engage with us, to challenge us, to write letters to the editor, to get into respectful debates with friends and strangers over what you read.
We are Augustana’s history, current events and future – a force too powerful to be buried in the trash.
Categories:
You can’t bury truth in the trash
March 6, 2020
14
0
More to Discover
Donald Trump • Mar 10, 2020 at 1:49 pm
1st amendment. You have freedom of press, we have the right to do with it as we choose. Sincerely,
POTUS.
Joe Mustacchio • Mar 7, 2020 at 5:48 pm
Sad.
Bob smith • Mar 6, 2020 at 8:48 pm
This was probably because the observer constantly expresses bias and disregards facts. Not saying all these incidents are appropriate, but the recent articles written have not been the most open.
Reply to the “Outside looking in” • Mar 6, 2020 at 5:44 pm
Voicing an opinion in response to an article is free speech. Throwing away the entire paper away is simply rude and uncalled for. One is speech, one is action. Please refer to the link below for further clarification:
https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/what-does
Colin K • Mar 6, 2020 at 5:04 pm
Throwing one newspaper away is expressing free speech. Throwing hundreds and preventing them from being shared is blatantly burying the news. Besides, the authors are not saying that the administration needs to find the culprit, or that there need to be some legal repercussions for this. They’re using their platform and freedom of speech to criticize the intent of somebody who threw out their newspapers, which they are well within their rights to do.
Outside looking in • Mar 6, 2020 at 4:38 pm
Interesting… a ‘supposed’ free speech paper is upset over someone expressing free speech.
‘92 Alum • Mar 6, 2020 at 4:44 pm
This is the dumbest possible takeaway from this editorial.
Betty • Mar 6, 2020 at 4:52 pm
Destruction of property is definitely not the same as free speech. Many thanks to the Observer staff who work to serve and inform their fellow students and community. Pursuit of truth is a noble and essential endeavor. Keep up the great work!
Red Menace • Mar 6, 2020 at 6:23 pm
Free Speech would be publishing a rebuttal, arguing about it. Silencing a voice by force is never free speech.
I have not expected the Observer to cover anything useful since it was taken over by the administration in 2012.
But your comment is so spitefully obnoxious I have to rise to the bait.
If you can’t make a better comment then go back to school and learn to think.
Ryan Silvola • Mar 6, 2020 at 9:22 pm
Some might call it expressing free speech. Most would call it censorship.
I support truth • Mar 6, 2020 at 11:30 pm
An action that prevents individuals from obtaining factual truth is not an action that falls under freedom of speech. That is censorship. Yes there are opinion pieces written in the Observer, but a majority of it is journalism. People are entitled to getting every side of a story.
Katherine Taylor • Mar 8, 2020 at 3:46 am
Sorry — THAT was censorship.
Outside looking in • Mar 8, 2020 at 3:49 am
Don’t be sorry…. but an expression of a person’s idea of the quality of the opinions of those that write for the rag.. .. not censorship.
Betty • Mar 9, 2020 at 3:17 am
Destruction of property is NOT free speech. Pursuit of truth is a noble and essential endeavor. Keep up the great work Observer staff!